Mi$cellaneou$

Here’s something that’s been making the internet rounds–after making a splash on CNBC’s “The Filthy Rich Guide”–and is worth pondering if you’re prone to second guess yourself.

Imagine being Ronald Wayne. Back in 1976, when he was 40, he was the third person in on the founding of Apple Computer. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, the cash-challenged catalysts, were both in their feisty 20s.

From the get-go, Wayne had misgivings about working with the young whirlwinds and the possibility this could all head south. Within two weeks, he sold his 10 percent stake back to the co-founders for $800. Today, that would be worth around $80 billion.

But no regrets, says Wayne, an electronics industry retiree with a net worth of $300,000. “If I had stayed with Apple, I probably would have wound up the richest man in the cemetery.”

Some epitaphs are better than others.

Railroading Update

What goes around … .

Shortly after taking office in 2011, the Tea Party-backed Gov. Rick Scott turned down $2.4 billion in federal funding for high-speed rail connecting Orlando and Tampa. Too risky, he said. The Sunshine State would still be on the “hook.” More to the point, no way was he accepting anything, however progressively beneficial and necessary, from the “socialist” administration of Barack Obama.

Fast forward to now. The state will be considering private bids to build a high-speed rail link between Orlando and Tampa. Brightline, the railroad line that connects Miami and West Palm Beach, has already put in a high-profile bid to build track along I-4 to connect Orlando and Tampa.

What’s changed–besides Scott needing to broaden his appeal for his Senate run?

The biggest change is that instead of the Orlando-Tampa megalopolis being already connected–with plans likely in place to push high-speed rail to Atlanta–this area fell farther behind the competition and quality-of-life improvements that meaningful mass transit promised. And modern mass transit, as we all know and most of us acknowledge, has long been the missing link in Tampa’s efforts to realize its smart-growth potential.

But now, eight years later, Scott would have us believe that he held out for better timing and a private-sector savior.

Here’s the reality, lest we forget, courtesy of the Florida DOT. Late in Scott’s first Tea Partying year, the DOT sent a post-facto report to the Federal Railroad Administration with revealing projections on Tampa-to-Orlando ridership and operational costs. The numbers, which were based on findings of two consulting firms–hired by the state of Florida–projected an annual ridership of 5 million and a surplus of $30-million to $45 million within a decade of start-up. The DOT also estimated 3 million passengers and a $4.3 million surplus in the initial year (2016) of operation.

And while we’re trafficking in railroading reminders, let’s not forget that the bidding consortiums back then–all the major global players–were never even given the opportunity to present their building plans. Instead, the “on the hook” mantra and a specious comparison with California trumped everything–including bottom-line input from those who would actually build the line along a shovel-ready corridor.

And speaking of input, the bid winner would have realized a major global marketing coup: It would have been heralded as the one that built America’s first dedicated high-speed rail line. Any chance that winner would have agreed to make up any deficits and overruns to get the contract?

Some things you don’t–and shouldn’t–forget.

Scott will soon be gone from Tallahassee. But the incalculable damage done–from short-term jobs to the long-term development and redevelopment of the Tampa-Orlando axis of synergy has lingered on as part of his con-jobs legacy.

Party Labels

In the best of all possible democratic worlds, party labels for local public office shouldn’t be part of the election equation. It makes sense that ministerial jobs that lend themselves to non-ideological competence should be nonpartisan contests.

But we’re obviously not in the best of all possible democratic worlds. Otherwise, the Donald Trumps and Rick Scotts wouldn’t get elected. Diligence is still due from the electorate. And when it comes to non-presidential years, the turnout can be embarrassingly low, and outcomes can be determined by activists and extremists.

Hillsborough County commissioners have voted to include constitutional offices–clerk, sheriff, property appraiser, tax collector and supervisor of elections–on a referendum ballot that would remove party labels from candidates. All five would be nonpartisan races. The rationale: How relevant is a “D” or “R” in evaluating candidates for sheriff or clerk of county court?

The only issue with a change to such county nonpartisanship, is that it ups the ante on voter responsibility. Will voters do their homework and make their call based on candidate experience and pertinent credentials? If not, what else would be a relevant difference-maker other than political affiliation as an indicator of partisan values?

Trumpster Diving

* “I REALLY DON’T CARE, Do U?”

As we’ve noticed, every facet of fashion worn by Terse Lady Melania Trump is a de facto statement. It’s her plagiarism-free, go-to communication mode So, which is it, Mel? Are you that clueless, that uncaring, that arrogant, or that, well, Trumpian?

BTW, what were your other message-jacket choices? “I MARRIED A BILLIONAIRE, U DIDN’T”? “I’M STILL HOT, UR NOT”? Or “U FIGURE IT THE HELL OUT”?

Unsolicited advice: File for divorce, break out the pre-nup agreement and move back to Ljubljana or risk becoming the Cursed Lady.

Final thought: Bess Truman never looked so eloquent and classy.

* The Civil Rights Office of the Homeland Security Department should not be an oxymoron.

Gun Reality

The numbers are always benumbing. Here’s a global gun update from the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey: There are more than 390 million civilian-owned firearms in the U.S. Or an estimated 120.5 guns for every 100 residents. The next highest ratio can be found in Yemen at 52.8 guns per 100 Yemenis. In raw numbers, India is second with 71 million firearms in circulation. In other words, nobody is close. This shouldn’t be part of “American exceptionalism.”

Here’s another number that seems in sync with a gun culture that venerates Second Amendment cherry-picking.  Last year Gallup determined that 42 percent of American households had guns on hand. That’s about 50 million households. That’s about an average of eight guns per gun-owning household. That’s scary.

Talking: The Right Option

*Donald Trump has been criticized for, among other summit things, legitimizing Kim Jong-un as a world-stage co-equal with the president of the United States. The orchestrated, optics-seen-around-the-world handshake did it. It topped Kim’s ultimate bucket list. It’s a huge, regime-enhancing deal over there; it’s more high-profile grist for the partisan political mill over here.

But while it was hardly a Ronald Reagan-Mikhail Gorbachev moment, it mattered mightily.

Ostensible, strategic quid pro quos are, as has been well noted, yet to manifest themselves. What the U.S. tangibly and verifiably got out of it remains to be seen. We know that.

But there is still this: What happened between Trump and Kim was well within the cardinal rule of statecraft that applies even to rogue dictators with warped priorities. You talk to the leader of the other side, no matter how dark.

Barack Obama voiced that reality during his presidential debates with John McCain. “You talk to your adversaries,” underscored the former president who even Republicans should miss more and more each perilous day. “The notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them … is ridiculous. We were willing to talk to the Soviet Union at the time when they were saying we’re going to wipe you off the planet.”

You talk to your adversaries–OK, enemies–because it’s part of any country’s enlightened self interest to do so. Lives are at stake. And if you’re America, it means you’re not too big to share a conference table–and global stage–with a nefarious lesser if the existential interest of imperiled lives is on the line. It is and they are.

This is not, to say the least, an endorsement of Donald Trump’s modus operandi, especially since his “Little Rocket Man” playground taunts and incineration threats helped, ironically, create the need for a summit in the first place. Especially since his understanding of Korea is likely derived from binge-watching “M*A*S*H.” But it is an acknowledgement that whatever the context, you need to talk. Whether it’s to Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, Bashar al-Assad, Ali Khamenei or Nicolas Maduro.

The Korean status quo–from war games and Cold War-remnant U.S. troops to an apocalyptic,  nuclear trip wire has to change someday. So let’s do something before “someday” is too late. Even if the two leaders are incongruous caricatures of real statesmen.

* It’s bad enough to flat out lie and scurrilously scapegoat Democrats for the administration’s aggressive “zero-tolerance” approach to illegal border crossings that has resulted in the inhumane separation of children from their parents, but it’s made worse with an unconscionable religious justification. Attorney General Jeff Sessions cherry picked a verse in the Book of Romans on obeying government law. “God has ordained them for the purpose of order,” he sanctimoniously declared. “I can say that it is very biblical to enforce the law,” underscored deplorably disingenuous White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.

Apparently “What you do to the least of my brethren, that you do unto me” isn’t applicable in the context of presidential fiat, kids-as-pawns politics and what appeals to the Trump base. Here’s hoping the American electorate will show its outrage–and conscience–with a backlash vote that shows “zero tolerance” for hypocritically cruel, political pandering.

* “He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.”–That was Trump’s deadpan riff on the relationship that Kim Jong-un has with his people. He was kidding. Of course he was kidding.

Wasn’t he?

* How do you go from being “America’s mayor” to Trump’s pimp, Rudy? From the point man for rallying a 9/11 city to being reviled by good people? From nonpareil to Nosferatu? Ghoul-iani, you sleep too well.

The Clinton Factor

I watched Bill Clinton’s interview with NBC’s Craig Melvin the other day and was transported.

I recalled that former Clinton adviser Paul Begala once talked of what it was like to be at a summit-like setting and knowing that “the smartest guy in the room was your guy.” Imagine.

I remembered Dick Greco telling me that he spent a few minutes in the back of the presidential limo with Clinton after he had flown to Tampa to make an address at Jefferson High School. Clinton asked Greco what was happening in Tampa, and the former mayor told him about the passing of the Community Investment Tax. Greco was later blown away by how Clinton lauded him in impressive, free-flowing, Clintonian detail for his pragmatic approach that included a football stadium as an inducement to get tax support for schools, police and fire departments. Vintage performance.

I wondered why he was submitting to a network interview until it became apparent that he was hustling a book. He even brought along his co-writer, James Patterson. Then he got combative and self-righteous in an exchange with Melvin when he was asked–inevitably–about his impeachment and the #MeToo movement. He wasn’t apologetic, he was arrogant. He turned a dialogue into a diatribe and ranted about sloppy journalism. He rhetorically asked Melvin if he thought JFK should have resigned. Etc.

Then I was reminded why Hillary Clinton isn’t president.

Yes, she had those email issues, Benghazi, Wall Street speaking fees and a flawed campaign strategy. But she still won the popular vote. But she was unable to rally enough women, including Bernie Sanders’ women, to make history that was there for the making against the most vulgar, vile, misogynistic presidential candidate in American history. That could only have happened if her background included being a disingenuous enabler for a predator of women, a predator who arguably still doesn’t get it.

Trumpster Diving

* Trump and Kim arguably deserve each other. The rest of the world deserves better.

* Not that we didn’t know optics was a major part of Trump’s summit “preparation,” but Larry Kudlow underscored that fraught reality when he acknowledged that the president was using the Group of 7 summit for North Korean signal-sending. Apparently counterproductive signals sent to fellow “allies” was not an issue.

Kudlow, the director of the White House National Economic Council, said Trump was “not going to let a Canadian prime minister push him around on the eve of this ( NOKO summit).” That’s why Trump didn’t sign off on the joint communiqué that formally wraps up a summit. It would have made him look weak was the rationale.

* “Fellow Republicans, this is not who we are. This cannot be our party.” That statement was from Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona. Too bad the few GOPsters, such as Flake, who speak out against Trump and his egomaniacal priorities are leaving public office. Real guts–and real “America First” values–are obviously not enough for the sycophantic, enabling cowards who maintain their compromised careers and don’t want to get “primaried” by Trump’s deplorable base.

* When it comes to illegal border crossings and the separation of children, it’s more than the usual political partisans who are weighing in against the Trump Administration. Exhibit A: the United Nations. “The use of immigration detention and family separation as a deterrent runs counter to human rights standards and principles,” pointedly noted–OK, scolded–Ravina Shamdasani, spokeswoman for the U.N. high commissioner for human rights. For the record, Nikki Haley was not pleased.

* “F*** Trump.” That was Robert DeNiro at the recent Tony Awards. Yes, it’s come to that. We get it. It’s almost too tempting to resist. It’s a high-profile, friendly forum. But it’s not helpful. No more than Michelle Wolf and Samantha Bee. It’s another unsettling, embarrassing reminder that we used to be better than this. This is what a devolving society looks like.

Trumpster Diving For Tariffs

Call it the perfect geopolitical storm: where protectionism meets isolationism.

The most frustrating and counterproductive aspect of the Trump Administration’s controversial tariff policies is that those countries most impacted are allies. Those we need for all kinds of reasons–from U.S. export markets to foreign-policy leverage. How weird that we seem to be getting along better with the renegade Kim Jong-un than with the respected Justin Trudeau.

Not nearly as affected, ironically, is China, which is no ally and no ethical trade partner. But it’s a de facto player in the upcoming U.S.-North Korea summit. North Korean exports to China account for more than 90 percent of NK’s international trade, and China is known to have employed a wink-and-nod approach on refined petroleum products finding their way into NK. China matters as much as China wants to. And Trump knows it.

* Some traditional, American-export related jobs will inevitably be impacted by tariff retaliation. It’s unfortunate, but practically karmic, that Kentucky bourbon will be among them. Spin that one to the base, Mitch McConnell.

* You can tell a lot about a government policy by its opponents. It’s typically the usual, partisan crowd. This, to be sure, is not typical. From the Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to GOP Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker to the Wall Street Journal, they stand in opposition to the Trump tariffs. They recognize the artifice of the deal.

* It hardly helps the FBI’s efforts to rally sentiment against Trump ridicule when one of their own makes headlines by accidentally shooting someone at a nightclub. The agent was dancing and doing a back flip when his service revolver fell from its holster, went off and wounded a patron at a Denver night spot. But, yes, he was off duty.

James Comey misses his old job less and less each day.

Senatorial Opportunist

You can’t blame Rick Scott for running for a U.S. Senate seat as an “outsider.” You can only blame an electorate that would fall for such mislabeling. There’s precedent for the con-jobs governor exceeding expectations.

He’s a two-term governor known for opaqueness, cronyism and veneration of Donald Trump. When not bankrolling himself, he has become a magnet for special-interest cash. He doesn’t drain swamps, he complements them.

Just because Scott remains awkward and poorly spoken doesn’t make him an “outsider.” Any more than walking away from the HCA fraud with (settlement) millions makes him an honest broker. Scott is an unpolished, geeky, opportunist version of all we loathe about insiders. And he could very well win. Again.