It was well noted when Florida Congressman David Jolly, R-Indian Shores, proposed a ban on federal office holders directly seeking campaign contributions. It was also acknowledged by most observers that it won’t happen–especially in an election year.
Were it realistic, it would be a start to rein in a system in obvious need of reining. But it wouldn’t affect what candidates’ campaigns could solicit. Nor would it impact incumbents. And it wouldn’t negate Citizens United.
Maybe members of the House should consider a more fundamental change. Maybe it’s time–or past time–to re-think a two-year term in the new normal of 21st century American politics. A 24-month term virtually assures that fund-raising–by whatever means, including winking and nodding Representatives–is one virtually continuous cycle. When a re-election watch party celebration turns into a de facto, fund-raising opportunity for the next campaign, it’s time for serious, real-world re-thinking.