Some things, we know, change when crossing state borders–from alterations in terrain to a difference in taxes. What shouldn’t be among the variables, however, is something so fundamental as same-sex marriage rights. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia now recognize same-sex marriages–either by court order, voter referendum or legislation. It needs to be all 50. This isn’t about speed limits or state income tax variables. This is about a civil right.
The Supreme Court, as we know, is now deliberating on two aspects of gay marriage. Are state bans constitutional? And if they are, do all states still need to recognize out-of-state same-sex weddings?
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. framed it appropriately. Allowing a states’ rights status quo is unacceptable. “You will have a minority of states in which gay couples will be relegated to demeaning, second-class status,” he underscored.